Reflection

I have to laugh. In researching for our Chapter 7 wiki text, I only found one article that does not demonize standarized testing. Actually, it is supportive of it! I'll post the resource later. However, I do understand why educators are frustrated. I did not realize how big the debate was between stardarized testing and constructivist type of assessments. It seems to be a debate between politicans and educators. I'm not saying in any way shape or form that policy makers who are not educators have no experience or right to make these decisions. However, I am also not saying that educators are being heard by these policy makers. (It is very scary to write this because the debate seems, in some places very heated, and I am attempting to write without bias either way!) However, I'm wondering about the balance because I see valid agruments in each view points. For example, we need statistical data, it helps make things clear and concise and direct. BUT...we are dealing with children, individuals that, around the country have different cultures and expriences that influence preformance and thinking that can not be measured the same. How do we solve the debate? I was not a good test taker in math, my standarized tests scores were always low, however, I also struggled with the subject throughout grade school and high school-my results matched. Some students do well on the standized tests, but do not do well in course content. So as of right now, overwhelmed, I don't know which method of assessment is better for all children and I am grateful that I am not the one who has to make that decision.